Changes in costs for Australian patents An important procedural change is being introduced in the process for obtaining an Australian patent. An important procedural change is being introduced in the process for obtaining an Australian patent. Read more
SNEAKER 63: A lesson in bad faith This case serves as a reminder that, if a trade mark is used by a company and is therefore an... This case serves as a reminder that, if a trade mark is used by a company and is therefore an... Read more
Case Summary – STIHL vs STIGA STIG Wilson Gunn represented Andreas Stihl AG & CO. KG in this case. Wilson Gunn represented Andreas Stihl AG & CO. KG in this case. Read more
Changes in costs for Australian patents An important procedural change is being introduced in the process for obtaining an Australian patent. An important procedural change is being introduced in the process for obtaining an Australian patent. Read more
SNEAKER 63: A lesson in bad faith This case serves as a reminder that, if a trade mark is used by a company and is therefore an... This case serves as a reminder that, if a trade mark is used by a company and is therefore an... Read more
Case Summary – STIHL vs STIGA STIG Wilson Gunn represented Andreas Stihl AG & CO. KG in this case. Wilson Gunn represented Andreas Stihl AG & CO. KG in this case. Read more
Changes in costs for Australian patents An important procedural change is being introduced in the process for obtaining an Australian patent. An important procedural change is being introduced in the process for obtaining an Australian patent. Read more
SNEAKER 63: A lesson in bad faith This case serves as a reminder that, if a trade mark is used by a company and is therefore an... This case serves as a reminder that, if a trade mark is used by a company and is therefore an... Read more
Case Summary – STIHL vs STIGA STIG Wilson Gunn represented Andreas Stihl AG & CO. KG in this case. Wilson Gunn represented Andreas Stihl AG & CO. KG in this case. Read more